Let’s write an ideally essay!

I want to note at once that there are few rules that can’t be violated exactly, and the essay itself is still a genre; there is where to disperse. How to write a good text at all? There are simple tricks and advice.

  1. Read a lot. Magazines, newspapers and books. Nothing forms a sense of language as quickly as reading. Reading helps to expand vocabulary, teaches you to work with syntax and argue the position. Pay attention to the good old epistolary genre.
  2. Know your audience and communicate with it in its language.
  3. Learn to work with the composition. At school, we were taught that there must be several thoughts in the body, which in turn confirm or challenge the thought that is key to the text. Before writing an essay, think about what this body will be like.
  4. Study the topic about which you write, as best you can. By studying, I mean two things at once: gathering information and analyzing it. Think about what kind of idea you are going to broadcast through an essay.
  5. Be able to dilute the text “jokes”, but don’t depart from the topic. Remember that your “jokes” should be understandable to the readers.

Avoid clichés. Texts filled with phrases that themselves ask for language aren’t interesting. To be aware of it, to enjoy the dishes, the forest of hands rose, pleased as an elephant. For example: “Don’t be a woman who sits and waits for her prince on a white horse” – the phrase is unsuccessful, because after the word “prince” the reader knows without you how the sentence ends. “Don’t be a woman who cocks at the window waiting for the equestrian division of princes and other titled persons” – still not ideal, because it is invented here and now, but it is already better. The reader understands what you mean, and sees, so to speak, irony.

Know how to ask the right questions. This generally applies to any text. In the case of an experienced essayist, this habit is included as soon as he opens the laptop. Don’t leave the reader in perplexity. Don’t skip the ligaments. If something is concrete to you, it does not mean that it is understandable to the reader. Reread the draft and ask the text questions that would be natural for the reader.

What our essay writing service will provide? Knowing that you are receiving valuable information and services is important to us, which is why we will provide several guarantees. Friendly and reliable service. Our professional staff is here to assist you with all of your essay writing needs. Our goal is to satisfy all of our client’s needs and no question will go unanswered. Our goal is to provide our clients with substantial information that they can carry with them throughout their collegiate career. Clients will have the ability to speak to someone about their assignment anytime with our 24/7 customer service line.

According to paragraph 1. Write a lot. Write about what you are interested in. Treat the essay as a way to organize the information you own. Good luck!

The best decision of any student: to buy compare and contrast essay and get a good mark

In the process of study or research, often you have to write works on comparative analysis. For example, compare and compare two historical figures, two political theories, two social trends, two scientific processes, and so on. The classical structure of comparative analysis contains a comparison of several objects. The author’s goal is to identify and compare their similarities and differences.

There are various ways of comparative analysis. However, let us dwell on the key points that should be included in the work on comparative analysis.

Context in compare and contrast essay

Define the context against which you will conduct a comparative analysis. In other words, describe the problem, theory, idea, containing objects that you need to compare. For example, if you are analyzing two similar legal rules, it is advisable to touch on the problems in the field of law in which they are applied. For greater credibility, the basis should lie not your own conclusions, but a reference to authoritative sources. Comparative analysis outside the context will deprive you of the foundation on which you will build your arguments in the process of comparing the selected objects.

Grounds for comparison

In the study, you need to justify the reason why you are comparing the selected objects. For example, you decided to compare what is more useful for a healthy diet: cabbage or beets. Readers should show the logic that guided you when selecting objects for comparison. And explain why you do not compare the nutritional benefits of carrots and cucumber? This is necessary for the reader to see that your choice is logical and conscious, and not imposed or taken from the ceiling. So, indicate the reasons for your choice.

Arguments in compare and contrast essay

You write a comparative analysis, so it is logical to operate with facts that can and should be compared when comparing two objects. Your statements are designed to show how objects relate to each other. Supplement, enrich these objects with each other? Contradict, dispute, do they exclude each other? The purpose of the arguments put forward is to show the ratio of the two objects. Your facts are built on the basis of the context of the idea (problems, theories) from which you have selected the compared objects. Showing the ratio of objects, you can use the following words: “while”, “while”, “opposite”, “besides”, “supplementing”, “excluding”, etc.

Methods of comparative analysis

Writing the introductory part of the work: the context, the reasons for comparison and the arguments, determine how you will compare objects. There are three methods for this:

A) first set out all the pros and cons of the object X, then – the object Y.

B) sequentially compare in turn the similar elements of the objects X and Y.

С) compare X and Y, placing more emphasis on one of the objects. This method is recommended in case X and Y cannot be fully compared. So, object X can act as a tool to determine whether object Y corresponds to the arguments that you put forward before.

Relation of compared objects to arguments. The work will look like a whole if you show the relationship between objects and key arguments. Without such a connection, the reader will find it difficult to see how the next part of the object comparison correlates with the arguments.

How to write the scientific article

You have a scientific idea and decided to share it. But you don’t know how to define the purpose, to set the task how to begin and finish the scientific article.

You need an algorithm of certain actions. All scientific works anyway have the plan and structure.

To begin to work with article, to you first of all, it is necessary to check uniqueness of the idea. The sense of scientific work directly depends on her originality. If the idea of your work is similar to the book, the academic year project, a thesis, it less interest will be shown by the reader. The science is a search new.

To make the plan of the scientific article – the second necessary component of work. The scientific article includes: introduction, review of literature, main part, conclusion. Dimensions: 2-3 paragraphs right at the beginning this introduction, 2 paragraphs are the review of the literature, the main part includes the theory and practice, introduction volume – 3 paragraphs. A conclusion and introduction have to correspond each other. Acquaintance with literature will help to collect necessary material for article, to formulate theoretical knowledge. At the end of work the list of references is the proof and confirmation of factuality, depth and objectivity of a research. It is important to work with modern sources as it indicates relevance and novelty to your work. To write and issue article, you need to adhere to scientific style. The main thing – logicality, objectivity, statement of the text on the principle “pyramid”: problem, decision, conclusions. Not categoriality of the text is important, the author expresses opinion, but it can differ from a thought of others.

Also the argument is important. For this purpose it is necessary to formulate correctly a thesis which will be clear, to find the facts which will prove a thesis. The argument has to be true and not contradict others. Leaning on authoritative sources, giving examples, you will be able to convince the reader of correctness of judgments.

It is important to check correctness written if you aren’t confident, how you have written a word, terms, check in reference books.

Scientific research

Any scientific work – from creative design to final design – is unique and carried out very individually. Moreover, uniqueness is expressed not only in the novelty of the results obtained, but also in the choice and originality of the ways, ways and means of obtaining these results. The creative process is the movement to the desired result in the absence of a search algorithm, and this process can’t be predetermined in advance, but is formed in the course of the search itself. But, despite this, it is possible to identify some general methodological approaches to conducting scientific research.

Scientific research is a very laborious and complex process that requires constant high incandescence. If research is carried out indifferently, it turns into handicrafts and rarely gives something significant. Scientific creativity requires maximum stress of all the energy of a person, his thoughts and actions.

Carrying out scientific research, it is necessary to be scientifically objective. It is impossible to throw facts aside just because they are difficult to explain or to find practical application for them. The fact is that the essence of the new in science is not always visible to the researcher himself. New scientific facts and even discoveries due to the fact that their meaning is poorly disclosed, can for a long time remain in the reserve of science and not be used in practice.

In scientific research, everything is important. Focusing attention on the main or key issues of the topic, we can’t ignore the so-called indirect facts, which at first glance seem insignificant. It often happens that such facts hide the beginning of important discoveries.

In science, it is not enough to establish any new scientific fact, it is important to give it an explanation from the standpoint of science, to show general, theoretical or practical significance.

Accumulation of scientific facts in the process of research is a creative process, in the basis of which the scientist’s idea always lies, his name. In philosophical definition, the idea is a product of human thought, a form of reflection of reality. The idea differs from other forms of thinking and scientific knowledge in that it not only reflects the object of study, but also contains the consciousness of the goal, the prospects for cognition and the practical transformation of reality.

Ideas are born from practice, observation of the surrounding world and the needs of life. The idea is based on real facts and events.  

Some secrets how to write an essay and pass the exam to “excellent”

Don’t try to memorize the texts of the finished works by heart, if the topic turns out to be somewhat different, this will negatively affect the result.

If at the first moment it seemed to you that you can’t write an essay on any of the topics proposed to you, don’t panic, sit, calm down. Most likely, after a while the situation will no longer seem so critical, and you will remember something.

If you are worried and can’t calm down, try the following breathing exercises: relax your arms and legs, close your eyes, take a deep breath, hold your breath for 20-30 seconds, then exhale slowly, repeat 5-6 times until you calm down.

Try to write on each topic everything you know. Then try somehow to sort everything that’s written down.

Carefully read all the topics, try to determine the exact lexical meaning of each word of the topic, and only then – the general lexical meaning of the phrase or statement. Think about the direction of the development of the topic, relate the topic of the essay to your knowledge and decide whether you can write an essay on this topic, or it is better to abandon it.

When choosing a topic, build on your knowledge and programming. Don’t try to create a literary masterpiece. Now you need to prove that you are able to write a composition correctly.

Write down the main points about which you would like to say in your essay, build them logically – this will be your initial plan. Refer to it while writing the text, it will help you keep the logical line and, therefore, open the topic.

Correlate the volumes of entry, conclusion and main body. The largest part should be the main part, the entry – about half the size, the conclusion is the smallest in volume.

Don’t forget that the epigraph is an adornment of the work, but if you are not sure if it is suitable, or if you know the text and punctuation marks inaccurately, don’t write it at all – nobody will lower the estimate for the absence of an epigraph.

The work organization of dissertation

Candidate dissertation is always a qualification work. You are defending some kind of work in which you show your qualifications. This does not necessarily have to be a breakthrough direction in science and practice. But sometimes this concept – qualification work – is somehow simplified. It is believed that if you wrote several formulas or 150 pages of reasoning, the qualification work is already ready and you can go to defend it. However, it is not. In any case, the Ph.D. thesis should contain at least a new look at some well-known statements of problems or some new solutions.

Who and how should set tasks? This is the most important question. The graduate students and masters themselves can’t set tasks, this is a normal phenomenon, it isn’t necessary to be surprised at this and worry about it. The ability to set goals successfully comes with experience. In order to be able to set tasks well, you have to work hard. Therefore, we are confronted here with two problems: the choice of the supervisor of studies and the choice of the topic of the dissertation.

Choice of the supervisor of studies. One of my graduate students was John Duggan. He is an outstanding person, I am very proud of him. John is an absolutely self-sufficient person, but this is not so much about everyone. I had two more self-sufficient people. So, advice. If you are not self-sufficient, never choose executives who do not have the time to deal with you. It is necessary to choose managers who have the time, opportunity and interest in you and your work. A graduate student or a master who are “taken for granted” turns out to be in a very bad situation precisely because they do not know how to set tasks.

Now about the tasks. There are tasks, problems and good intentions, this must be clearly distinguished. Karl Popper has wonderful words: “Science has no areas or branches of knowledge, in science there are unsolved problems and the need to solve them.”

What is the task in this situation? As I understand it, the task should clearly define what is given and what we intend to get and more, the problem usually knows the ways to solve it and the apparatus we use. That is, the task is always specific, as in the school curriculum. An example is, say, data analysis using linear regression. You have an apparatus, you solve the problem and receive something. Another example, you have input data, you have a model that describes the behavior of participants, you need to find first-order conditions. This is the task.

The problem is a little bit different. It is known that is given, but what we will get is far from known. Moreover, the apparatus and technique are often unknown. They have to invent a problem or modify some existing ones. Whence there are problems and how they are solved, on this theme many books are written. There is a remarkable book by Thomas Kuhn ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, there is an amazing book by the great French mathematician Henri Poincaré.